Doubts about the crucifixion?

Question by Advicer: Doubts about the crucifixion?
We know that the crucifixion was a feather degrading that served as an example to others, the body of the crucified was left to decay on the cross and death happened slowly of asphyxiation, could last many days, we also know that the Jewish ritual funeral was very simple and soon blanket the body was a white shroud and buried.

Starting this:
Why the body of Jesus was taken down?
Why he was crucified in a particular place and not public?
Why his “death” was quick to point Pilate “marvel”?
Why, when the spear of Saint Longinus pierced the body of Christ made out blood? We know that corpses do not bleed, but the Bible says that after slain, came out water and blood of Jesus (John 19:34)
Why i passed ointments healing in the body?

Let’s we see:

The three supreme Roman sentences were the cross, fire and animals. What made the supreme were not exactly his inhuman cruelty or his public disgrace, but the fact that he could not be nothing left to be buried at the end. As it turns out my assumption is correct, the crucifixion was NOT the corpse taken down from the cross …

Jesus according to the Gospels “died” in a little over five hours (Luke 23:44) … (…) The Gospel According to Saint Mark says Pilate, knowing that a crucified takes days to die, was surprised when he reported that Jesus had already died. (…)

According to Mark 15:44: “Pilatus autem mirabatur you would obisset et accersito centurione interrogavit eum itself would Mortu platôst” which translated, gives “and Pilate marveled if he were already dead., And summoning the centurion, he asked him if he there was much that had died. ” Pilate was not just surprised, but marveled …

The Gospel of John says (19:41): “At the place where Jesus was crucified, there was a garden, and in the garden a new tomb, in which no one had ever been laid. ” So, Jesus was not crucified in a arid mountain-shaped skull, or in any other public place of execution. Was crucified in a garden containing a private tomb, or in its vicinity. According to Matthew (27:60), this tomb and this garden were the personal property of Joseph of Arimathea,

So, what do you think?

Best answer:

Answer by Kwark
I doubt the whole thing,
If it ever happened, the crucifix was a stake not a cross.
This was a story of fiction. Thus the inconsistency to reality.

Give your answer to this question below!

Be Sociable, Share!

6 thoughts on “Doubts about the crucifixion?

  1. “The Fathergived them to me…” not your preaching. The FATHER will bring them to Yeshua, even if the last Watchtower had been sold six month ago.

  2. Christianity is largely warmed-over Mithraism. It’s not the sui generis, shining new philosophy that many Christians believe it to be.

    “Jesus Christ” is an entirely mythical figure who never existed at all, not even as an ordinary person around whom a cult was built. The amount of independent, reliable, contemporaneous, secular evidence indicating his existence, once one pushes aside Christian forgeries (e.g., interpolations in the writings of Josephus) and other such “proofs” — is exactly *zero*.

    So the details of the alleged Jesus’s alleged crucifixion aren’t terribly interesting to me.

  3. No, actually, I have no doubts. That’s the answer to your question. As for the rest of your post, I stopped reading at “feather.” — ??

  4. i think you have never been to israel. the place of the skull, or the hill of golgotha where Jesus was crucified is only short distance from the garden tomb. the garden can be easily seen from the hill. both are located near the northern gate of jerusalem, the old city.

    the body of Jesus was taken down because he was dead and joseph of arimathea was a wealthy and influential man who went and asked pilate for permission to take Jesus’ body down. (john 19:38), which pilate gave him.

    it must be remembered that pilate was in charge in jerusalem and could do what he wanted to do and also that pilate did not find Jesus guilty and had wanted to let him go to start with but feared a riot from the jews who protested and demanded that he release barabbus instead. pilate was uncomfortable with having to have Jesus crucified to start with, so it is not surprising that he allowed joseph of arimathea permission to take his body down from the cross instead of allowing it to remain and decay as was the normalproceduree following crucifixions.

    also, it is true that pilate was amazed that Jesus had died so quickly, but we must remember that not only was Jesus so badly beaten that he did not even resemble a human being prior to having been crucified, the scripture says that “he gave up the spirit within himself and died”….he died on purpose and willfully once God piled all the sins of the world upon him.

    Jesus had even said in john 10:17-18 that no man had the power to take his life and that he laid his life down willingly and that only he had the power to do so and the power to take it up again if he so chose to do.

    as for the piercing of Jesus’ side, there is no place in scripture where the man who did that is named, so where you get that name from is nothing but heresy. but Jesus had just died and everyone who knows anything about biology can tell you that when a person first dies, they still have some body fluid in them. the scripture says that water mixed with blood came out when the soldier pierced his side and that is perfectly normal.

    he was crucified in a very public place. the hill at golgotha is seen from the road to jerusalem and besides that, he had to walk from pilate’s palace through the streets of jerusalem which is about 3 miles, and all along the way, the crowds which were gathered jeered at him, threw stones at him and cursed him.

    Jesus death was quick because he is the messiah of the jews who was sent first to save his people israel and all the events around his death needed to be over before the sun went down on friday and the sabbath began so as not to violate jewish law and thereby give the jews an excuse to claim that he could not be their messiah.

    as for the ointments, it was typical stuff they put in with all dead bodies to try to keep them from stinking to much as they decayed. remember, they did not bury people to much under ground, but in tombs or sepulchers which were above ground. so when a person died, they prepared him/her for burial by placing spices and ointments with them in the burial clothes. many of them were they same herbs and spices and ointments they used for healing, but it was only for the smell of them, no other purpose.

Comments are closed.