Has Your Work as an Expert Witness Been ?Peer Reviewed’?

In the 1993 Supreme Court case “Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals,” Justice Blackmun said for the unanimous court that an expert’s testimony has to rest on a reliable foundation and has to be relevant to the task at hand. He brought up the key consideration about whether the theory or technique used can be or has been tested and subjected to ‘peer review’ and publication.
Expert witnesses have seen their work rejected and their testimony excluded when they haven’t attended to Daubert standards of peer review.
Identify another specialist in your field that the court can treat as a peer. So if you are a biomedical engineer, another biomedical engineer would be a peer, and so on. Your attorney can retain this person to review your work, specifically your expert report. A peer reviewer would provide his own report of findings regarding the subject matter of your expert report. Yes, this may sound like double work, but an increasingly appropriate and valuable extra step. If another expert independently verifies the validity of your work, it will help to ensure the legal admissibility of that work. In addition, this extra step can bring extra credibility to your work. This will further support the relevancy and reliability of your work, opinion, and testimony.
The peer reviewer should submit his report directly to the law firm that engaged both of you. By and large, your attorney will submit your expert report, along with the peer reviewer’s report and a CV describing the peer reviewer’s background, training, and skills. You should not have any contact with the peer reviewer after the law firm retains him and before he submits his report back to them. Keep the points of this paragraph in mind because, from time to time, you may be hired in a case as a peer reviewer rather than as an expert witness.
Sometimes a peer review is called a third-party review, because the other party may not be a precise peer, but may still be a specialist in a related field of expertise. You should use such a third-party reviewer if part of your testimony includes information that is close to, but not specifically part of, your primary experience.

Judd Robbins has been an internationally recognized expert witness since 1986 in the US and in the UK. In 2010, his book “Expert Witness Training” was published by Presentation Dynamics. Robbins has advanced degrees from UC Berkeley and the University of Michigan, has been an Information Systems manager and an Education Systems manager, and consults in both computer and legal issues. Learn more about Mr. Robbins and his Expert Witness Training materials at www.juddrobbins.com

Ensuring Admissibility of Your Work as an Expert Witness

Playing by the regulations of this legal game will help ensure the admissibility of your work. The goal is to convince people that your opinions are sound. Your investigations and overall work will help you to do just that. After you collect, review and study all the data about the technical elements of a case, perform the required tests, and follow necessary methodologies, you can form opinions that you can express in an expert report or in testimony.
What you do will help you technically and professionally come to the best opinions. How you do it will help ensure that your opinions are seen as ‘admissible’ and that they will be allowed to be heard in court.
Remember, you are on a playing field called ‘the law.’ You have to play by the rules in this game:
1.  You must be familiar with the facts in the case and the sequence of any events that happened.
2.  You must carefully document tests run, observations made, and measurements taken. contain all results, whether positive or negative.
3.  Any demonstrations you plan to use during testimony have to be substantially the same as the events in the case.
4.  Any materials you use in tests must be the same as were involved in the case.
5.  You must document all steps followed and methods used. Use industry literature and publications to show that the chosen tests or methods are recognized as authoritative in your field.
6.  Think About with your attorney whether to use and pay for an independent peer review of your analyses and work.
You very well might do strong investigative and preparatory work, but you are not an attorney so you will not know about all the legal elements of the lawyer’s case. occasionally you have to meet legal standards that vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction; explicitly ask your attorney about the standards for your particular jurisdiction so you can choose the tests you run. For example, Maryland, Rhode Island, or California may use different legal tests for insanity. As a psychologist, perhaps, you need that data so you can pose the right questions.
attorneys will use numerous tactics to raise objections about the validity and admissibility of you, your evidence, and your opinions. Anticipate the following possibilities:
*  You are not qualified by knowledge, skill, qualifications, training, or education in the scientific field needed for this case. In advance, prepare your explanation of why your background does indeed qualify you to offer opinions about the facts in this matter.
*  Your opinions did not flow from reliable facts or data. Again, be ready to show that the facts were reliable and that your opinions did reasonably flow from them.
*  You did not use reliable methods in your work. Prepare to cite examples from your field and its literature that show that you did.
*  You did not run enough tests or collect enough data to justify your conclusions quantitatively. Keep accurate notes and be prepared to show that you ran the tests and collected the data needed.
*  You haven’t used qualitatively relevant conclusions. Make sure the facts you rely on, and the opinions you suggest, are directly on point to the case.
*  You relied on hearsay to form your opinions. Ensure that any facts you use, whatever the source, is routinely relied on by experts in your field.

Judd Robbins has been an internationally recognized expert witness since 1986 in the US and in the UK. In 2010, his book “Expert Witness Training” was published by Presentation Dynamics. Robbins has advanced degrees from UC Berkeley and the University of Michigan, has been an Information Systems manager and an Education Systems manager, and consults in both computer and legal issues. Learn more about Mr. Robbins and his Expert Witness Training materials at www.juddrobbins.com

Restaurant Expert Witness (http://www.RestaurantExpertWitness.com), Howard Cannon – Restaurant Expert Consultant – Hospitality Expert – Restaurant Litigation…
Video Rating: 0 / 5

More Expert Witness Articles

Romana’s Pilates – Power House Mat Work Reviews

Romana’s Pilates – Power House Mat Work

Romana's Pilates - Power House Mat Work

Joseph Pilates developed a unique fitness system combining aspects of martial arts, gymnastics, yoga and ancient Greek training techniques, focusing on the coordination of the body, mind and spirit. Pilates practiced what he called “The Art of Contrology” until his death in 1968, at the age of 88. He left his studio – and his legacy as a trainer, teacher and innovator – to his student and colleague Romana Kryzanowska. Today, the conditioning system bears his name, is one of the most

List Price: $ 14.98

Price:

Pilates’ Return to Life Through Contrology: Revised Edition for the 21st Century [Paperback] [2012] (Author) Joseph Pilates, Judd Robbins, Lin Van Heuit-Robbins

Pilates' Return to Life Through Contrology: Revised Edition for the 21st Century [Paperback] [2012] (Author) Joseph Pilates, Judd Robbins, Lin Van Heuit-Robbins

List Price: $ 40.23

Price:


Motivational Quotes That Work

Motivational quotes became terribly modern when the net extremely took off, and other people would use them as signatures in their posts on forums, or as signatures in their emails.

 
plenty of quotes will be extremely effective, however there’s additionally a true case of overkill, and a way that employing a somebody else’s words in your email or as any kind of tag line these days nearly causes you to look to a small degree low-cost.
 
One of the opposite issues with motivational quotes is that everybody has heard them these days. There was a time when most of these things was original, however as a result of the speed of how things progress on the net, most of the really expert quotes are vastly overplayed, and seriously overuse. Sop the question comes back to 1 of why do folks use motivational quotes, why do they suppose they’re necessary.
 
I feel a part of the rationale is that a motivational quote kind of says one thing indirectly, or by implication that’s additional powerful, as a result of it’s describing one thing that you just cant extremely place into words, rather liker parables.
 
The power of plenty of stories, like quotes is in their that means that goes beyond words, each in their literal that means, however additionally in that that that means touches us in away that’s vital and infrequently goes quite deep in our psyche. the rationale folks use motivational quotes such a lot, i feel is as a result of they need heard or scan one thing that they notice terribly vital and has affected them quite deeply in how, and that they wish to share it, that may be a terribly natural tendency.
 
Downside is that you just cannot share an expertise in words or the other manner extremely. Once you begin making an attempt to, you lose it which is that the downside with motivational quotes, they really find yourself trying to a small degree low-cost, that is kind of the other impact of what you needed within the initial place.

To see some of these quotes illustrated click here:http://www.squidoo.com/motivational-and-inspirational-quotes2 . It is still widely available in the best quotations and famous quotes Motivation and inspiration for Team Work.

More Expert Witness Articles